The Muslim Brotherhood radicalizes people and aim to establish a global Islamic society. More than half of young French people place Sharia above the laws of the republic meaning that they share the same political project. The Muslim Brotherhood thrives in countries that are guilty, ashamed, and seek forgiveness, unlike countries that are proud of themselves such as Muslim countries. Left-wing intellectuals are the perfect target. The Ummah is the community of Muslims in the world, it transcends borders and is led by Hassan El-Banna. The Ummah is responsible for catching up with the West technically while maintaining religion. They say that there is nothing good outside of Islam, which is incompatible with secularism and is supremacism. The non-Muslim must be fought or convinced, first in Muslim lands and then in the world. They avoid the frontal conflict that can be fatal to them, seek to create an autonomous protective force and approach political structures. They recruit in a Ponzi scheme and say that hatred is in the other. Rather than removing the individual from his environment, the individual must influence his environment. The organization is pyramidal and very hierarchical where members infiltrate everywhere. They infiltrate and raise awareness of their cause from a young age so that he is not aware of his transformation or his contribution. Many Muslims have become accustomed to life in Europe and do not want to leave, especially since some would end up in prison in Muslim countries. Sayyid Qutb describes jihad as an armed struggle, not just a spiritual one. The richest Muslim countries are encouraged to finance the development of Islam in European countries without compensation by Ali Kettani. By abusing the term "Muslim minority", it reinforces the feeling of belonging and allows one to pass oneself off as a victim. In 2005, $90 billion were paid to support them, many of which came from the Saudis. Not to mention that Europe accepts this with open arms under the guise of integration and living together. The few times the left is interested in it, it minimizes the infiltration or even justifies it. The UOIF (Union des Organisations Islamiques de France) opened by the brothers covers the territory with 250 local associations (JMF, EMF, LFM, SIM). Yusuf Al-Qaradawi presents himself as a moderate but is at the origin of the doctrine of the "happy medium" defining a system of action for the brothers and for whom all the resources of the Ummah must fight those who are not part of it. He is the master of trickery and compromise. They seek to install a substitute civilization and prepare the tools to build a pure and healthy Islamic society. All Islamic movements converge towards a global Islamic culture and a Muslim vote. Today it is visible mostly with the halal market. The influence is such that we study Islam more than Islamophobia. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi insists on the fact that the violence comes from a minority of Muslims before excusing them because they would only be the cause of discrimination and Islamophobia. Islamophobia serves the political and religious project of Islam as it allows to re-educate the population. They attack the human sciences because it is too hard to attack hard sciences. Western science is amoral without purpose, no need to please a God. If a Muslim researcher says something against Islam, it is over for him. The Muslim Brotherhood believes that violent attacks are counterproductive and that we must just convert as many people as possible, but the scam is elsewhere: we can be violent in case of self-defense and the system of action creates the conditions to find ourselves on the defensive (provoke violence to respond to it). They play the victimization game at 200%, in particular against the supposedly discriminatory Western Human Rights to the point that they create their own via the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation). ICESCO (Islamic World Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) specifies that Muslims are not compatible with Europe and that even non-Muslims must respect the sacredness of Islam from which Islamophobia will result. Then the notion of Euro-Islam is born, which is the need to change the way Europeans look at Islam, the need to adapt Europe to Islam rather than Islam to Europe. The FEMYSO (Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organizations) is supported by the EU and says to detach from the Muslim Brotherhood but to still share their ideology and vocabulary. The fight against Islamophobia serves as a pretext for political activism. Victimism, the art of arousing an emotion of collective support, to obtain advantages. It becomes hard for Muslims themselves because not liking a part of Islam is being Islamophobic. The anti-Islam sentiment ends up being confused with the anti-Muslim sentiment, making Islam something uncriticizable at the risk of creating their defensive violence. Refusing a practice becomes an Islamophobic act because it is equivalent to rejecting Islam in its entirety. Muslims play the victim card to the full without ever mentioning the Arab-Muslim slave trade or the Muslim conquests. Islamophobia is the most powerful weapon of radical Islam to impose itself in Europe but also in the whole West. Research on Islamophobia consumes the resources of those analyzing Islam as a social and political fact, and the more time passes, the less researchers dare. The more murderous Islam is, the more we call for tolerance for fear of reprisals. Since secularism prohibits the wearing of the veil, it is Islamophobic. Since secularism is in the law, it is the law that is Islamophobic. The current left shares with Muslims the hatred of the West.
Florence Bergeaud-Blackler