The white man carries too much guilt today, everything that goes wrong would be his fault and he has committed the original sin of a new religion. Maghrebis who desired France as one desires a woman now see her disfigured: she has let herself go and she has bad company. Two profiles suffer from an identity problem and contribute to the misfortune of France: immigrants who do not cut ties with their country of origin and the French without French culture who believe themselves to be European or even American. The French recognize sovereignty and let the fate of France be decided in Brussels, immigrants cannot or will not assimilate it and will end up installing a new civilization in France. We have trivialized the fact of no longer being at home by allowing lawless areas to proliferate, yet another selfish cowardice and a loss of sovereignty. People deserve to be governed by the republic, not by a dealer, a mafia, or an Islamist regime. The renunciation of internal sovereignty radiates outwards, we cannot claim to control France without even controlling Paris. People of Moroccan descent leave France for Morocco to be safer and clientelist votes are controlled from abroad. France finances its own depression. Subsidizing the people to be respected is useless, it is the way of governing and the predictable rules that count. Protect then seduce, especially for lawless areas. They may claim to love difference yet they are only comfortable among their own. We like to see our values confirmed in others. All values are equal in a sense, and everyone is happy arbitrarily speaking, but all this diversity creates a permanent irritation and the feeling of being abroad at home, which is torture. This impacts all communities, no one feels at home. It is not racism or xenophobia, it is a need for intimacy and mental comfort to love, create, and innovate. All this has also killed travel, you just have to go to the grocery store to go to India. Making a Frenchman takes longer than making an American because the common base is less light: the French baggage is heavier the American baggage. Countries with high diversity are the most violent like Brazil and the United States where everyone is armed, or the non-democratic Emirates. Elites want to destroy France out of hatred and others let it happen out of interests, and fascination with the United States that they like to copy. We no longer train French people at school but a paw ready to be shaped by the USA, Islam, China, or others. We can only be what we can because we have genetic, cultural, and social determinants. There is a soul in all cultures even if they are different, but it is always better than being anything. Fluidity is sterility while pure blood is fertile. France is moving towards tropicalization, not linked to immigration, but to a drop in the overall level like accepting generalized violence, hyperinflation, and the disappearance of the middle class like our South American cousins. Even companies are making fun of us and we are going to start wanting it. Bringing out the police to give an image of security is the modern Potemkin village, false appearances to please, walking the dog to entertain. The people who let themselves be infantilized are also at fault. It is the nature of collapsed countries and the third world to no longer pay attention to manners and the weak. We were disarmed by the church, then royalty, then the republic that claims to protect us. We must take revenge, demean the other, and use symbols. French colonization was not the absolute evil that disrupted civilizations in full bloom, it found only desolation there. This does not justify colonization but it should be qualified, and it even prevented certain crimes such as the great replacement of the Khmers by the Thais and the Vietnamese, allowing today's Cambodia and Laos. The Maghreb was a cutthroat and, while Africa was not aware of itself, the white man saw in the black man the black man. Colonization was made possible through collaboration with natives who had scores to settle in any case, such as the Zouaves in Algeria and along the Moroccan coast where many of them had a grudge to express. Beyond internal collaboration, neighboring external natives also took part in the conquest, such as Morocco, which was colonized with Algerian, Tunisian and Senegalese soldiers, and Algerians in Madagascar, Indochina and Mexico. Colonization did not have the funding for its ambitions to educate and vaccinate properly on a scale, especially since there was neither flourishing agriculture nor gold-rich soil in the colonies, meaning that the civilizing mission did not take place. Only French soft power helped to awaken the colonies because, even if the colonist could be hated, he showed what is possible and that it is up to you to improve your country. It was a positive contamination by imitation as with the social lift by competitions rather than the assassination of the sultan in the Maghreb and the gerontocracy in Africa. All the independentists were young people inspired by France to upset the social lift. Colonization allowed the people to demand something from the state rather than being crushed by it. Colonization and immigration are bad business for France but it continues because of the lobbying of certain careerists who benefit from it. There will always be someone to defend the indefensible as long as they benefit from it: the military rose in rank more quickly, Catholics evangelized more quietly, leftists need subsidies. Twisted ideas are defended by people, sometimes intelligent, who are cowards and let themselves be corrupted. The politicians did not think: Giscard d'Estaing and the Medef only thought about having arms but not about the social consequences of family reunification, François Mitterrand did not think about the death of secularism that SOS Racism brought, no one thought about the greater need for police and the renewal of HLMs every 5 years. The colonies were loyal to France during WWII, they played France's game, there is some good in immigration. Everything is nuanced in the human kingdom, we simply have to tell the truth. After the fact, some natives no longer wanted colonization but still wanted French help to finish their work. There was so much atrocities on both sides that there is no accountability and everyone is a victim in this, we must now build. Those who continue to stir up resentment towards France are those who have no other choice because of their incompetence and criminality. Vietnam progressed while Algeria stagnated, everyone must find their own formula and some complain because they can't admit their own failure. They say "Down with France" but France is already on the ground. The Maghrebians and Africans have no idea what to do to develop. There is no reason for France to send money out of the windows to the Maghreb and Africa, especially since they do not want to develop because moralizing their behavior, giving up corruption, meritocracy, and equality do not interest them. Over there, the important thing is to know who is who because they do not believe in equality, this is what blocks development and installs a certain comfort zone. The elites of the north want arms to maintain the farce that is France economy for a few more months as well as legal security to do business in the south while the elites of the south want us to let their revolutionaries pass and to be able to invest in the north. It is the people of the two regions who lose. Thus the south is emptied of young men full of dangerous testosterone and of its disgruntled bourgeoisie, who would also end up insulting their host country in the north. What these two populations do once in the north would be severely punished in the south. Maghreb and Africa are far from being emerging like Asia.
Driss Ghali