Big cities are the mirror of globalization. Do not confuse the situation in France with the situation in the USA. The revolt was born in the outskirts of cities, not in the suburbs. The fragility index observed from 1999 to 2010 does not classify the suburbs as the most fragile place. Based on several criteria (share of workers, employees, precarious jobs, unemployment, income instead of only income), distance from urban centers characterizes fragility from which debt results because of constraints. The ruling classes are seeking to adapt France to a global market. We have 2/3 of the GDP produced in large cities and we need 2 profiles: the highly qualified and the unqualified. The more the rich gather in the city, the more the workers are a minority there. The middle class no longer exists and the periphery is neglected by politicians and intellectuals. The city is the winner of globalization, the periphery is the loser. The suburbs are the buffer between these two zones, an airlock between the north and the south. The vocabulary changes: poor becomes synonymous with minority, rich becomes a sign of white. It is not political parties that influence the electorate but the opposite, the speech adapts to the electorate. The real fracture/division is that between the city and the periphery, between winners and losers. The left-right divide is outdated. The Muslim electorate is the protégé of the left even though they think differently on many points. For the poor, France must stop opening up to the world, for the rich it must open up more. However, this mobility only concerns the most qualified, it is said to be chosen and deprives countries in difficulty of their best talents. The rich have the choice of the border and have a lifestyle that is not sustainable. The question of identity and society prevails over that of globalization.
Christophe GuilluyMen stopped complaining to take distance. The MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) movement has noted the inequality between men and women where the majority of suicides, deaths at work, and manual workers are men. What scares the state the most is not the poor rioting yellow vests or the employees whose salary is deducted at source, but the liberals who can decide together to no longer pay the taxes that the state needs so much. Everything that people break, the State repairs with people's money and increases taxes. The MGTOW movement is honest about its sources and know that it did not invent anything. Feminism is only possible within the framework of social democracy thanks to the aids (CAF, social housing, etc.) which creates single mothers. The protective man has been replaced by the State. In the past, a couple went through difficulties together unlike today. For social assistance and housing, it is not FIFO (First In, First Out) but according to an unfair distribution logic: the migrant who has just arrived with 5 children or a single woman with 1 child will pass in front of a couple with 1 child. Men pay more taxes because they do jobs that pay better because they are better at them and are more rational. The MGTOW movement takes the opposite view of the dominant discourse in male-female relationships. They like dominant men because, beyond being dominated, they will be protected. They create rules for the beta that they break for the alpha. Women seek the feeling of protection in violence. Don't be violent but capable of violence. The norm of meeting your partner young and staying with them is over. TradCon praises the sacrifice and suffering of men, they accept sacrifice because life is not easy. It was valid before, but what about today? Will we die for valuable women or OnlyFans influencers? You must choose for whom and what you sacrifice yourself, you must procreate to have a higher goal. It is at birth that we finally take care of something more important than ourselves from which we cannot detach ourselves. If we do not have children, it is the state that recovers all the heritage. We must transmit when we are ready, not too early or too late.
L'ObservateurPeople are NPC (Non-Player Character), become the main character. You've learned how to behave by copying others and can easily become a slave to a never-questioned programming you had over the years. A main character has a vision and takes control. You are a perspective vessel in a subjective reality. You move through reality depending on your perspective. Conditioning narrows your mind. The most dominant threat to society is someone who doesn't rely on it. Expose yourself to chaos and create clarity/sense/order from it. NPC excuses are programmed in them, become aware of your own. To start, set new goals and immerse yourself in proper information sources. Passion comes with action. More than being aware that you copy others, use the info you get from them. Juggle between your own ideal self perspective and the universe's to zoom out. You become what you consume, consume the content of 3 to 5 mentors that you choose consciously and carefully. Become a mad scientist by trying things over and over: research (apply content to your goals instead of just consuming), test (advises aren't laws and must be tested in your situation), experiment (try different methods and avoid being dogmatic), discover (note patterns that get results in alignment with your goals), document (write what gets results to leverage/sell it). Create or be created.
Dan Koe